The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On March 22, 2015, at around 01:17, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim at a place where many unspecified people live, by openly referring to the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant reported that the Defendant 112 was frighting a beer, such as having a beer’s disease on the floor, without paying the drinking value; and (c) the Defendant recommended the Defendant to pay the drinking value and return home; (d) the E (38 years old and south) of the victim D District United by the Defendant, who was called out after having received a report of 112, to the effect that he was frighting on the floor, such as having a beer’s disease on the floor.

Judgment

1. An offense subject to prosecution on complaint (Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act);

2. Submission of a written agreement containing intent of revocation of complaint by the victim on May 26, 2015, which was subsequent to the institution of the instant case;

3. Grounds for judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act).