logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.07.11 2014고단1797
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From January 2012, from the Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government's first floor, a commercial sex business operator operating D'D', and Defendant B is the head of the above business establishment.

At around 23:00 on May 8, 2014, Defendants conspired and arranged commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 100,000 per capita from E and F, a customer, who was found in the foregoing “D,” and by providing them with KRW 40,00 to female employees G and H, and arranging them to conduct sexual intercourse and similarity intercourse in the room entered by the said customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G, H, E, or F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Defendant B who choose to imprisonment: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014); Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) include the confessions of the instant crime and the names of the Defendants, the Defendants were the initial offenders, Defendant B’s employees who are not direct beneficiaries of benefits arising from illegal business, and other conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, shall be comprehensively taken into account.

arrow