Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, a co-principal of the Defendants, was willing to engage in commercial sex acts by taking charge of the overall responsibility of arranging commercial sex acts as operators of D in Yangsan-si C and 2, and Defendant B (from October 2018, around October 201) was willing to engage in commercial sex acts by taking charge of guiding customers as employees of the above D.

As above, from June 2018 to October 14, 2019, the Defendants conspired to employ female employees from the above D, and provided guidance to the marina room in the amount of 10 to 130,000 won from the customers who found the place, thereby allowing female employees to engage in sexual intercourse, thereby helping them engage in sexual intercourse.

2. A around October 2019, Defendant A received 130,000 won from a male guest with no name, and engaged in sexual intercourse with a male guest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each detailed statement of deposit transactions, field photographs, and real estate lease contract;

1. Defendant A of the relevant criminal facts: Articles 19 (2) 1 and 21 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. In accordance with Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., the prosecutor tried to confiscate the lease deposit claim (the lease deposit returned claim preserved for forfeiture by the Ulsan District Court 2019 early 923) on real estate in which the defendant A engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic in this case.

Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as scambling and arranging sexual traffic.