Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on February 15, 2013 at the Changwon District Court sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 23, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence.
【Criminal Facts】
At around 23:20 on May 13, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting E at a district unit of the Changwon Police Station D, Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, which is located in the window C, and being conducted voluntarily along with E, and re-afusing E, and he was controlled by the security guard F, who is a police officer belonging to the said district unit, by the police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the said district unit, and was brued by the Defendant, such as “E racks, will die, will die inside the inside the inside the inside the inside the inside the inside the inside the inside of the inside of the inside of the inside, and whether the inside of the inside of the inside of the outside of the Republic of Korea will be brued twice the chest of the F.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;
1. Each police statement to F and E;
1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to judgment, etc.);
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime committed by the defendant was the police officer who investigated him/her at the police station. This is a serious criminal that impairs the rule of law, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the defendant committed the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the same time during the suspended sentence period, other than the defendant's criminal records, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc., and determined the sentence against the defendant as ordered within the scope of the sentencing guidelines,