logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2020.04.17 2019고단1833
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 13, 2019, the Defendant was driving a non-registered 110c c occ substitute with a 110c c occ leb, without obtaining a driver’s license, from around 18:21 to around 3 km section from the front day of Pyeongtaek-si B to the front day of C, and without obtaining a driver’s license, in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.207%.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of 49cc Oral Ba, without any number plate specified in paragraph (1).

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance, such as the statement in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of a user driver and report on request for appraisal;

1. Notification of detection of a unregistered two-wheeled motor vehicle, and inquiry into driver's license data;

1. Application of accident video CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (3) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 2 of Article 154 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment prescribed for the violation of each Road Traffic Act due to the driving of a motor vehicle and the without a license for the motor vehicle driving)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a letter or a motorcycle with high drinking water.

arrow