(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.06.09 2020고단308

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.06.09 2020고단308

특수상해

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 04:15 on December 29, 2019, Defendant A: (a) reported that the victim B (n'e, 28 years of age) who met with studio Da 1stud in Changwon-si C, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, had a conflict with the Defendant's friendship; and (b) caused injury to the victim, such as two open boxes, which require approximately one week medical treatment, by taking the victim into account the dangerous articles on the table, where the victim had a right head.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1) above, injured the victim, such as the head of the body and the open part of the other parts requiring treatment for about two weeks, on the part of the victim’s head, by displaying one empty scam, which is a dangerous object on the table table for the victim A (30 years of age) against violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Part of the police statements made to E, F and G;

1. A report on internal investigation (referring to internal investigation related to attachment of field photographs);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Investigation report (the submission of an injury diagnosis report and sound recording file) (the determination of the defendant's assertion);

1. Defendant A asserts that there is no satisfy against the victim A who had been suffering from the injury of the victim B.

However, in the police police, the victim B was faced with the wall that the defendant was suffering from the wall that he was faced with, and the second was faced with the right head on the wall that he was faced with. The victim B stated that the defendant was faced with the wall that he was faced with the wall that he was faced with.

The contents of G's statement and the photograph and diagnosis that the victim gets out of the scene at the time are consistent with this.

Although the E/F at the scene of Defendant A and Defendant-friendly relationship, the E/F stated that Defendant A was only the victim’s second wall and did not directly comply with the victim B, the credibility of this part of the statement can be seen as favorable to himself/herself.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2014.07.15 2014고단481

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단6069

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.20 2013노4374

-창원지방법원 2013.05.14 2012고단2099

-서울북부지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단4271