logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2021.02.16 2019가단10883
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,686,175 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest from July 7, 2017 to February 16, 2021 and the following.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Defendant, a company with the purpose of collecting and transporting construction waste, supplied the aforementioned housing removal work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) from the owner of the housing located in the racing-si, and subcontracted D the installation and removal work of the external rain gauge to D during the instant construction work.

The Plaintiff, a Chinese national, was employed at the construction site of this case to D and carried out the installation and removal of the instant zone. The Defendant was additionally requested from the owner of the said house to remove the street trees at the construction site of this case and requested D to carry out the removal of the street trees on May 17, 2015.

The Plaintiff, while organizing a cable on the same day, was faced with an accident that fell at approximately 1.8 meters high (hereinafter “the instant accident”). Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the instant accident, e.g., the e., the e., the left-off electronic and the e-mail-shielded e-mailed e-mail, the right-side e-mail, the right-side e-mail, the right-side e-mail (damage), the right-side e-pathal ma (e.g., aquatic e-mail).

With respect to the instant accident, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Labor Welfare Corporation for payment of benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance”) with the Defendant as the employer. The Plaintiff was paid the amount of KRW 97,90,970 (i.e., 20,610,530 medical care benefits of KRW 33,975,080 (i.e., 43,405,360 disability benefits of KRW 20,610,530), which was paid (from May 17, 2015 to July 31, 2016, 113, and 329). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute on the grounds of recognition], entry in Gap’s evidence No. 1 to 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole, the Plaintiff asserted by the Plaintiff party to the instant construction work to remove the instant work from the street recipient at the construction site.

arrow