Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 14, 2013, at the Defendant’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant made a false statement that “If the house owner increases the monthly rent and lends the monthly rent of KRW 6 million to the victim, he/she will repay it until May 28, 2013.”

However, in fact, at the time, the defendant had not been given a certain amount of income, and even if he has borrowed money to another person for a debt including the loan amount of KRW 22 million, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant is against the victim of the same damage.

2. At around 12:47, at around 15:6 million won, a national bank account (E) in the name of the defendant was issued as a loan.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and acquired 6 million won from the victim.

2. On March 25, 2013, at around 23:00 on March 25, 2013, the Defendant concluded that “If 4.5 million won is required due to the agreement amount of the assault case, it would be repaid until May 28, 2013” by putting a phone to the victim at the place of the preceding port.

However, in fact, at the time, the defendant had not been given a certain amount of income, and even if he has borrowed money to another person for a debt including the loan amount of KRW 22 million, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant is against the victim of the same damage.

3. At around 11:29, 26. Around 11:29, 4.5 million won was delivered to the national bank account as a loan.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and acquired 4.5 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The defendant denies the crime of defraudation by the police statement protocol against D. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant was aware of the following circumstances, and ① the defendant did not have any particular property or income source as a basic living beneficiary, ② the hospital expenses, monthly income, living expenses, etc. of the husband before every month.