Text
All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Defendants B and A of the facts charged are legal married couples. A
Defendant
B1) Around 22:00 on June 27, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed violence by spiting the victim A’s face on one occasion, spiting, or spiting the victim’s face on one hand, as a result of a son’s kindergarten expense; (b) around 16:00 on June 6, 2020, on the ground that the Defendant: (c) the victim laid his/her clothes, and (d) committed violence by spiting the victim’s body.
B. At around 22:00 on May 27, 2020, Defendant A spited spits against the victim B on two occasions, which are spiting spits in C apartment D, in a spiting manner.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act.
However, according to the records, since victims have withdrawn their wish to punish each other after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.