A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 16:45 on April 21, 2019, the Defendant was subject to regulation on the ground that he invadedd the central line to the police officer E and security guards of the Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station D District D District, Seoul, Nowon-gu, and driven a G Poter car.

When the Defendant explained the fact of the central bed, the Defendant expressed his desire to “Chos and Is in violation of the fat” to E, carried the body of E once by hand, fated it by hand, and fats it, fats with bather hand, fats with bather hand, bats both arms, fats with drinking arms, and fats with the bats of a bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

2. The Defendant damaged the property cost of KRW 200,000,000,000,000 won by drinking free windows operated by the Victim H on the ground that the Defendant was subject to traffic control, such as the preceding paragraph, at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A H statement;

1. Investigation report (verification of patrol booms and video images, and verification of cost of repairing glass);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the Dobbox 24 Blue video CDs and video CDs

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act requires strict punishment as an act of violence against police officers who perform legitimate official duties.

However, the punishment of the defendant shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant is late, and there is no criminal record of the defendant exceeding the fine, and the fact that the victim of the damage to the property of this case does not want the punishment of the defendant by the original agreement.