Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on April 6, 1992.

At around 21:00 on April 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) provided a sexual intercourse with B and once in a room in which it is impossible to know the “Gel” room located in Seojin-gu, Seoul; and (b) provided a sexual intercourse with B over nine times from that time until September 3, 2012, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

In this respect, the defendant was sent to the above B over nine times.

2. Defendant B, even though being aware that he was a spouse of the above A, had sexual intercourses with A at the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph (1) above, and had sexual intercourses with A more than nine times from September 3, 2012, from that time, until September 3, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant was divided into A and A, respectively, on nine occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint, written appraisal, and marital relation certificate;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of each Criminal Code (the confessions of crimes and reflects them, Defendant A is the first offender, Defendant B is punished by a fine and not more than three times, Defendant B deposited KRW 15 million for E, etc.).