logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.06.07 2016고단278
사기등
Text

The crime No. 1-B, C, D, and 2.2 of the judgment of the court below against the crime No. 1-A and No. 3 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court on April 18, 2013, and the said judgment was finalized on April 26, 2013. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court, and on September 12, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

A. The Defendant is the victim on the first floor of the Econdo building in Gyeonggi-gun D on December 2010, on the following grounds: (a) fraud against the victim C; (b) preparation of a private document for qualification solicitation; and (c) fraudulent document for qualification solicitation; and (d) fraud: (a) the Defendant is the representative director of the Plaintiff on the first floor of the building in

The price will be paid if the construction work for the remodeling of the container is done.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the representative director of the E is F, and the defendant has made a contract with F to conclude a plan for the settlement of disputes and a building acquisition contract with F and to pay it separately from the pre-contract deposit, all the construction cost, including the acquisition cost, was thought to be paid by the Bank, and it was not possible to make a loan from the bank, and it was not clear whether it is possible to make a loan from the bank, so there was no intention or ability to pay it even if it was done by the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had the victim do construction work from December 22, 201 to January 201, 201, and did not pay KRW 85 million to the victim, thereby acquiring the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the same amount.

2) Although the defendant is not the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., as described in paragraph (1) above, on January 10, 201, the defendant prepared a private document with the content of "E: the ordering unit" from the first floor of the E-mixed located in Gyeonggi-si D on January 10, 201 to the above C: the price of the construction: the Gyeonggi-do Yangyang-gun G non-K and the price of the construction: the imposition tax of KRW 85 million per day (85 million): the separate construction period; January 10, 2011 - April 14, 201; and the content of "Seoul-do Yang-gun G" and the trade name column in the main column of Gap.

arrow