The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is against the defendant's wrong, the fact that the defendant's misjudgments, the fact that he/she needs to look at the wife who lives in the second degree of brain-disease disorder, and that the profits from the crime of this case can not be seen as much, and that he/she operated.

There are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as closing down the D.

However, the crime of this case is committed by forging official documents or private documents to interfere with the appropriate examination by the public officials of the competent administrative agency, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair because the punishment imposed by the court below is excessively excessive beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, in full view of the following: (a) there are many cases of obtaining a license for passenger transport business by means of the number of forged official documents and documents and the number of copies and fraudulent methods; (b) the defendant has been punished by committing several offenses while operating a private taxi license brokerage business; and (c) other various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, and consequence, etc.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.