A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:30 on July 6, 2014, the Defendant argued with four persons, such as women, etc. in the name of the E and his/her female-friendly job offers, who drink and singing together at the D main points located in the Dong-gu, Singu, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, and a woman in the name of the E was injured during this process and sent back to the ambulances.

Although the defendant, a guardian of the above women, has already been on board the ambulances and has to urgently send the above women to the ambulances, the defendant was subject to the control from G assistant of the Suwonnam Police Station, which was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of intrusion.

The defendant sent the face of the above G slope to the defendant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the maintenance of public order and relief, and at the same time, the victim G slope needs to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (including field situations, etc. and attaching photographs of the victim's upper part of the body);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the point of obstruction of performance of official duties: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the point of injury: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished in order to establish a legal order of the country with reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and eradicate the light of public authority.

However, the degree of injury caused by the crime of this case is not significant, the defendant is against himself and herself repented, and there is no record that the defendant has been punished more severely, and the age, character and conduct, health, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.