A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Chuncheon District Court's original state support on December 4, 2009, and on April 18, 2012, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant was driving a B presson under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.187%, without obtaining a driver’s license from the 1km section from the main point of the road, which is the mutual “feldy salary,” located in the North west-do of Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, the crossing-do, Seoul, to the same Eup/Myeon-ro 23-ro, and without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The defendant is a person engaged in the business of driving a motor vehicle with B pressle knife in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

On June 17, 2014, at around 21:55, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, sniffing alcohol, sniffing snow and walked properly, and was unable to walk properly, due to the influence of drinking, such as the sniffing distance, but, by driving the said vehicle, it was difficult to drive normally, but the Gu-ri road, which is located in 23-lane in the direction of the Gangwon-do-do-ri-do-ro, the crossing-do-ro, along the direction of the crossing-do-do Office of Education, led to two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of the crossing-do.

At the time, at night and at the night, Category C-owned D-owned cargo was parked, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly operating the operation and steering gear of the vehicle and driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the following parts of the cargo vehicle due to negligence, which led to the shocking of the cargo vehicle as the front part of the said van.

Ultimately, the Defendant was a victim who was on board the same line of duty due to the foregoing negligence.