Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
(b) move;
All of the fixtures on land, such as trees, graves, etc., and superficies shall be included.
【Matters of the special agreement
1. A contract to sell and purchase this real estate may be executed by classifying the land and superficies.
(2) Article 1 (Indication of Sale and Purchase Real Estate) of a real estate sales contract and superficies, which is officially announced on August 2007.
1. Land: Compensation for superficies within the land of this case;
2. Article 3 (Sale Price) of all the above-mentioned buildings, and other buildings, graves, crops (the relocation by December 31, 2007) and above-mentioned buildings, fixtures on ground, such as trees, and superficies.
1. The total purchase price shall be KRW 53 million;
3. The purchase price shall include buildings on sale and purchase real estate, agricultural products (the relocation until December 31, 2007), trees, and above-ground fixtures, such as graves, and superficies.
【Matters of the special agreement
1. A contract to sell and purchase this real estate may be executed by classifying the land and superficies.
1. Detailed details of indication of buildings and ground objects, Hongcheon-gun *
1. 1,250,000 won for expenses incurred in purchasing landscaping stones: 25 tons of trucks 25 tones* 450,000 won; and
2. Expenses incurred in clearing forest land (14,000 won per square meter*855) 11,970,000 won;
3. The amount of superficies and other compensation in the limit of 30,000,000 won for the relocation expenses of 53,220,000 won: Matters of the special agreement 53 million won and 53 million won.
1. Farm products and all other cultivated products may be cultivated only until December 31, 2007;
(3) A sales contract of a building and ground property owned by September 10, 2007
C. Various circumstances revealed by the fact of recognition as above, i.e., the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is compensation for agricultural crops, such as brain ginseng, etc., but the contract made between the Plaintiff and the non-party company does not coincide with the above contract made between the Plaintiff and the non-party company in terms of “the purchase cost, reclamation cost, and relocation expenses,” and as for the seed expenses or management expenses of the brain ginseng that the Plaintiff paid to D, D did not clearly state the usage of KRW 28 million that it was received from the Plaintiff, and unlike the testimony that there was no other transaction, D did not clearly state the usage of KRW 28 million.