logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.17 2016가단96164
손해배상
Text

1. Defendants E, F, G, H, I, J, and B respectively correspond to the amount of damages set forth in the attached Table attached hereto to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Defendant E is a party’s position. Defendant E is a 2nd underground floor in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K from December 15, 1992, and C building of 6th ground level (hereinafter “C building”);

(2) Of 201 square meters and 131.39 square meters underground and 101.39 square meters, Defendant F entered into a sales contract between November 11, 2009 and 123.47 square meters among C buildings; Defendant G from November 11, 2009, the above 101-3/5 square meters from November 11, 2009; Defendant H Co., Ltd., from August 29, 2006 to August 29, 2006, the owners of 301 square meters among C buildings; Defendant I and J, from December 15, 1992 to December 39, 191; and each of the owners of 1/2.5 square meters from December 16, 2016 to December 16, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased the said 301 square meters and 1.65 square meters from March 16, 2016 to May 16, 1965.

5.3. Registration of transfer of ownership under Plaintiff’s name was made.

3) Defendant Cbuilding Management Body (hereinafter referred to as Defendant Cbuilding Management Body)

b. On July 1, 2016, a large number of rains occurred in the above 501 inside banks, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “the water leakage in this case”). The water leakage in this case occurred.

C. Although Defendant H’s managing body did not separately determine the management rules or appoint a manager through the meeting of the management body, Defendant H’s managing body received management expenses, etc. from sectional owners in D’s account, and disbursed C’s cleaning expenses, etc., and maintained and manage C’s building. [In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, Party A’s 1, 3, 11, 13, 17, 19, and 17, and 19, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion summary, Defendant B, as a seller of the instant sales contract, is the seller of the instant sales contract, is the warranty against the seller’s defect liability, default, and default.

arrow