logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.06 2015가합2370
해고무효확인 등
Text

1. On April 30, 2015, the Defendant’s dismissal against the Plaintiff on April 30, 2015 confirms that the dismissal is null and void.

2. The Defendant on January 2015, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a worker of class 3 B who is employed by the defendant from April 3, 2012 to November 10, 2014, with the aim of efficiently managing and operating facilities and projects designated by the head of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, thereby contributing to the convenience of the residents' living, the promotion of welfare, and the improvement of productivity of autonomous districts.

B. Audit of Yangcheon-gu and recommendation of disciplinary action against the plaintiff 1) The defendant's superior agency, Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as "Yyangcheon-gu").

between September 15, 2014 and October 2 of the same year, the audit of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “audit of the year 2014”) shall be conducted with respect to the Defendant.

On November 19, 19 of the same year, Yangcheon-gu notified the Defendant of the result of the audit in 2014, and notified the Defendant of the result of the audit in 2014, and also notified the Defendant of the recommendation to take measures for social position status, which requires the Defendant to take disciplinary action. The Yangcheon-gu recommended the Defendant to take a heavy disciplinary action on the ground that “the Plaintiff was negligent in inspecting the service performance of the Defendant’s employees even though he was in general in charge of audit as B,” and the specific details are as follows. Matters requiring disposition on the status of the Facilities Management Corporation: 43 persons in total (10 persons in severe disciplinary action, 6 persons in light of minor disciplinary action, 10 persons in total, 10 persons in charge of minor disciplinary action, 10 persons in charge of minor disciplinary action, 17 persons in charge of minor disciplinary action, and 300 persons in charge of the work performance at the time of performing the current position misconduct in the position of the Corporation.”

arrow