logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.30 2015가단5748
채무부존재확인
Text

1. An accident described in Paragraph 2 of the attached Form No. 2, based on the insurance contract of the Plaintiff against the Defendant.

Reasons

1. On May 2006, B entered into an insurance contract between the Plaintiff and the insured with the insured as the Defendant on the basis of the purchase price of the injury, death, and the disability amounting to 50,000,000.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. As a result of an accident described in the Defendant’s argument that impedes the Defendant’s satisfaction, the Plaintiff shall pay the Defendant the insurance benefit for the remaining disability.

B. In light of the evidence Nos. 2 and 2, the result of the medical record appraisal entrustment to the Korean Medical Association, and the result of the fact inquiry to C Hospital, the evidence requested by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize the above assertion. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit, and there is no obligation to pay the remainder disability insurance money to the defendant as to the accident stated in the order

I would like to say.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.

arrow