logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2016.01.28 2014가합774
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On December 30, 201, according to the attached insurance contract, the defendant was incurred in the vicinity of the king-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 13:00 on December 30, 201.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 23, 2000, the Defendant concluded an insurance contract with the Plaintiff.

B. At around 13:00 on December 30, 201, the Defendant suffered injury, such as king-si, king-si, king-si, king-si, king-si, in excess of the central line, due to the following accidents: (a) the detailed brain and bovine spongiformiforms with no open room in two areas; (b) the duplic of a cuplic, suplic, embus, and cup at king-si; (c) the Defendant suffered injury.

C. On December 2013, C representing the Defendant claimed insurance proceeds from the harm inflicted on the Defendant during the course of the injury inflicted on the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 7

2. The defendant's assertion that the ratio of the remaining disability is 100% due to the occurrence of the insurance accident described in the order of the attached insurance contract during the period of the contract, and the rate of the remaining disability is 140,000,000 won in total (10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,00

3. Determination

A. The fact that the defendant suffered an injury is recognized as above, and the plaintiff should pay the insurance money under the terms and conditions unless there are special circumstances to the contrary, unless the defendant asserts that the harm remains.

B. As to this, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant against the agreement is unjustifiable, since the Plaintiff paid the amount of the compensation insurance for the remaining disability that the Defendant suffered from the said accident, equivalent to 50% of the payment rate of the remaining disability, and the Defendant agreed not to claim the compensation insurance for the remaining disability related to the said accident.

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement of evidence Nos. 2 through 4, and 12, the attorney D and C representing the defendant shall claim insurance money for the disability suffered by the defendant due to the above accident to the plaintiff on October 15, 2012.

arrow