logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.04 2014가단532398
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B and the Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association jointly share KRW 37,701,583 to the Plaintiff and Defendant B against this.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B is a licensed real estate agent running the D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and Defendant C is a licensed real estate agent operating the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and Defendant Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity which entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant B and the above Defendant to compensate for the damages incurred to the parties to a transaction by causing property damage caused by intention or negligence in the course of acting as a broker, within the limit of 100,000,000 won.

B. On July 15, 2011, the Plaintiff requested the lease of a house to reside in Defendant B, and the office of the said Defendant and Defendant C was found, and on September 3, 201, the Plaintiff changed the F and F owner to the “Y of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, G on September 3, 2012.”

Of the three-story multi-family housing buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground, 301 (hereinafter “instant housing”) concluded a lease agreement with each of the terms of KRW 120,000,000 as lease deposit and the term of lease from August 26, 201 to August 26, 201 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

C. At the time of the instant lease agreement, each of the instant building and its site was registered as a creation of a mortgage of the maximum debt amount of KRW 371,80,00, 120,000,000 with respect to the mortgagee of the right to collateral security, the Saemaul Correction Saemaul Bank Depository, the maximum debt amount of KRW 120,00,000, the mortgagee of the right to collateral security, the HP, the maximum debt amount of KRW 100,000,000, and the mortgagee I’s establishment of a mortgage of the right to collateral security, but the remainder remains at the time of the commencement of the lease due to a special agreement under the instant lease agreement and was cancelled on August 19, 201.

Defendant B and Defendant C, while mediating the instant lease agreement, explain to the Plaintiff the maximum debt amount regarding each of the said mortgages established on the instant building and its site, and attach it to the instant lease agreement.

arrow