logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.08.19 2013가단101711
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's motion to intervene shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 25,200,000 and the Defendants’ respective amount.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C is a licensed real estate agent engaging in real estate brokerage business under the trade name of “D,” and Defendant Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity which has entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant C to compensate for damage caused by intentional or negligent damage to the parties to a transaction in the course of conducting brokerage services for a specified period between May 6, 201 and May 5, 201, respectively.

B. On October 1, 201, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with Defendant C’s brokerage to lease each of the four floors (hereinafter “instant housing”) from among the multi-family houses and neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant building”) with the size of 18 households on the 6th floor above the 6th floor of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the title of which was owned by E and E (hereinafter “instant building”). From October 17, 2011 to October 17, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement to lease each of the instant building and its site (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). On April 28, 2010, the Plaintiff had the lease agreement with the maximum debt amount of 420,000,000,000 won, the lease agreement with the National Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, the neighboring maximum debt amount of 168,000,000, 100,000, and 10,000, NAJ, respectively, under the lease agreement.

C. In mediating the instant lease agreement, Defendant C explained the maximum debt amount regarding each right to collateral security established on the instant building and its site to the Plaintiff, and indicated in the column for “matters of rights other than ownership” in the description of confirmation of the object of brokerage attached to the instant lease agreement, but did not explain the details of the lease agreement of another lessee who had already resided in the instant building, and presented relevant materials.

arrow