1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: (a) the period from 4, 17, and 5, 3, of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the same shall apply in accordance with

2. In full view of all the circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, including the health care unit in relation to the amount of consolation money paid by the Defendant and C, the details and period of the unlawful act committed by the Defendant and C, the marriage period and family relationship between the Plaintiff and C, the influence of the Defendant’s unlawful act on the Plaintiff’s common life and the degree of mental damage sustained by the Plaintiff, etc., it is reasonable to determine the amount of consolation money to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff as KRW 10,000,000. Therefore, with respect to the Plaintiff as consolation money, KRW 5,00,00 as well as the portion cited in the judgment of the first instance court, and KRW 5,00,000, which was served on the Defendant, from November 9, 2015 to July 13, 2016, which is the day following the delivery of the duplicate of the complaint of this case, to KRW 10,500 per annum from the day following the judgment of the first instance court, to the day after the judgment of 20.5% per annum per annum.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair as it is in part of the conclusion.