logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.18 2012가합92321
대여금반환
Text

1. Defendant B, C, D, and E are each of the Plaintiff KRW 200,000,000 and Defendant B with respect thereto from February 19, 2009.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B, C, D, and E

A. Defendant B borrowed KRW 200,00,00 from the Plaintiff in relation to the golf course business right lawsuit of Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”), and guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Plaintiff on February 18, 2009 by Defendant C, D, and E, pursuant to Article 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the above Defendants are deemed to have been led to confession between the Plaintiff, Defendant D, and C, and the entire purport of the arguments and arguments can be acknowledged by taking into account the following as a whole: (a) there is no dispute between the parties, or between the Plaintiff, Defendant D, and E, and the entire purport of the arguments and arguments.

According to the above facts, Defendant B, C, D, and E are as follows: (a) from February 19, 2009 to the Plaintiff KRW 200,000,00; (b) from February 19, 2009 to November 15, 2012, Defendant B is an obvious statement that the copy of the complaint of this case was served on Defendant B; (c) 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from November 16, 2012 to the date of full payment; (d) 20% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from February 19, 209 to the date of delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case to Defendant C; and (e) 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from February 19, 2012 to December 16, 2012 to the date of full payment; and (e) 10% per annum as stated in the Civil Act from December 17, 2019.201.

arrow