A defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a company that is hedging with the complainant C (son, D). The defendant is dissatisfied with the complaint that the complainant maintains dial-a-the-job partnership with himself and her even after hedging with her. On April 5, 2017, the defendant's page (Desate: F) of the defendant's Patch (Desate: F) does not want to make it too much to do so, but it is too bit bit of bitch bitch.

The 15th E University No. C is too same as bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

‘Publicly insulting the complainant, such as the accompanying list of crimes, including the one posted.'

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C Statement Protocol Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines;

1. In the same way as this case’s reasoning for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the act of insulting or impairing reputation on the Internet bulletin board is also a case where the injured party makes an extreme selection in the event that the damage is serious due to the high radio wave level.

Defendant

In addition, it is doubtful that these effects are old and this method is selected, and that the victim's accusation does not delete notices until the date of public trial after being investigated with the victim's complaint and did not appear until the date of public trial is present at the date of public trial does not have to delete it as the defendant's vindication does not have to maintain it as much as possible

In other words, within the crime of insult, the methods of crime or the results of damage are not all poor.

One of the remaining important factors is the background of the crime.

The Defendant demanded the victim to continue to maintain only § 22(a) partnership relationship with the Defendant in the course of avoiding the suspension of her return to the victim. Accordingly, the Defendant suffered heavy mental pain, which led to the instant crime in order to liquidate such abnormal relationship with the victim, and to prevent the victim from committing the instant crime.