(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.24 2018고정2585

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.24 2018고정2585

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 17, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s chest at a “D” office operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, a law firm “D” office operated by the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 12 to refuse to hold an attorney-at-law interview from the victim E (the son, the 36-year-old age), who was an employee of the said office, and assaulted the victim’s chest.

2. The Defendant: (a) destroyed property damage, at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) on the foregoing grounds; and (b) destroyed the victim’s property by leaving 300,000 won in the market price, which is the victim C, owned by the said office, on the wall; and (c) destroying the victim’s property by digging out a magazine with 300,000 won in the market price.

3. The Defendant interfered with business, at the time and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, posted a magazine outside the above office room for the foregoing reasons, laid the chair, laid the chair, laid off the seeure to E, who is an employee of the above office, and cut off the monitor on the reception platform for about 10 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim C’s law firm operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each photograph, CCTV image CD Defendant, and defense counsel denied part of the criminal facts by asserting that the Defendant was a legitimate act, since the Defendant only directed towards the ground at the time of committing the instant crime, and did not have any fact leading to the victim. Rather, the Defendant resisted that it was a legitimate act as it was for the victim to resist the unfair discrimination against the victim.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant did not have the victim E's body.

Even if the victim exercised the force of force toward the victim, the establishment of the crime of assault is not an obstacle. Moreover, it is difficult to find out the circumstances unfairly discriminated against the defendant in the victim at that time, and even if so, the crime of this case by the defendant constitutes a legitimate response.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.04.10 2015고단469

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2015.11.05 2015고단398

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.06.09 2020고단308

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.03.20 2019고단164

-의정부지방법원 2020.11.13 2020노2103