beta
Cases
2017Do10288 Commissioned Elections Act by Public Organizations, etc.
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Law Firm BJ
Attorney BK, D
Law Firm B
Attorney C, BL
Judgment of the lower court
Cheongju District Court Decision 2016No1264 Decided June 16, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
October 31, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted all of the facts charged. In so determining, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violating Article 63(1) of the Act on Entrusted Elections by Public Organizations, Etc
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Kim Chang-suk
Justices Park Young-young
Justices Lee Dong-won
Justices Kim Jae-hyung, Justice Kim Jae-hyung.