logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.06.16 2016고단195
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person working in the position of the Secretary General at C Association D D Branch (hereinafter “D Branch”) and is working in the office of D Branch offices located in the fourth floor, Jung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, about November 19, 2015, and 1,079 members, including the business owners of F Branch G (hereinafter “G Branch”) H in the F Branch G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G Branch”).

G Letters delivered to I or J under the name of G is a letter that enables several members to read and see, and therefore, it is absolutely unnecessary to do so, and (m) a retired employee (K) who is not a member with low-income class or a dispatched member (L) who is not an employee with no capacity to serve in the field of member business shall not be absolutely required to write his/her signature at the time of visiting a member business.

(b) simultaneously sent the word “afterward.”

However, the Defendant, who worked in G branch by November 2015, was dismissed on January 14, 2015, held a general meeting of G branch without any authority on October 7, 2015 with N of the head of the former branch office that was dismissed on or around January 14, 2015, and resolved to transfer to the F Federation’s away from the F Federation and its existing members.

Therefore, the above branch assembly and resolution were invalid, and the victim K was aware that it was a person re-employed in G branch around November 9, 2015.

Nevertheless, the Defendant sent false letters to G branch members of G branch by openly impairing the reputation of the victim with the intent to defame the victims of public relations to the effect that the Defendant’s act of acting as the head of G branch and the said victims would cause the former members of G branch to confuse with similar organizations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness K and N;

1. A complaint;

1. A copy of minutes of an extraordinary general meeting, a copy of the articles of incorporation, the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel by the defendant and his defense counsel are not false and false, and the defendant's act is for the public interest of the members of the former G branch, and thus, "the purpose of

arrow