logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.31 2018누71382
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment in addition to the following cases. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the first instance court’s rejection of the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The second instance court’s “23:25” in the second instance judgment was dismissed as “23:11.”

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 13-1 through 13" in Part 12 shall be applied to "No. 13-1 through 12."

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow