logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.29 2017고정55
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as a worker in daily employment.

1. The Defendant registered as a person of bad credit standing and asked for the lending of a mobile phone to B who was unable to use a mobile phone in his/her name.

B, under the premise that the defendant bears the burden of using fees, the mobile phone (number C) was the defendant.

While using the above mobile phone, the Defendant entered B’s resident registration number “E” without obtaining permission from B in the settlement item for personal certification in the process of paying the amount of KRW 50,000, connected to D on June 3, 2012.

The Defendant denied the other person’s resident registration number by way of entering B’s resident registration number when settling KRW 300,000 over six times in both the same day.

2. The Defendant, using a computer, etc., was a bad credit holder due to his/her failure to repay debts equivalent to KRW 30 million, such as overdue credit card payments and bank loans.

In addition to those bad credit holders as above, there was no intention or ability to pay the fee even after using the cell phone specified in paragraph (1) from B due to the lack of a certain income.

Nevertheless, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant settled the foregoing mobile phone content cost of KRW 50,000, and processed information so that the complainant’s resident registration number “E” was entered without any authority in the aforementioned mobile phone’s payment item, which is a data processing device such as a computer, to make payment.

In such a way, the Defendant obtained financial benefits equivalent to KRW 300,000 by inputting the resident registration number B without authority six times on the same day.

3. The criminal defendant uses the mobile phone stated in paragraph 1, which was admitted to B in the name of the defendant for the same reasons as paragraph 2, but is willing to pay service charges, such as the installment of the cellphone.

arrow