logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.01.12 2016고정444
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 25, 2016, the Defendant, C, and the Defendant’s name in the facts charged were faced with the Victim F (58 years of age) and the shoulder in the E Garan bar located in Do, Won-si on August 25, 2016, and the Defendant and C, and the Defendant were influencing the face of the victim by drinking the victim, the victim was influencing the victim’s arms by hand, the Defendant was influencing the victim’s arms, and the brucing of the bridge was prevented, and C was influcing the victim’s chest when the victim’s face was taken by drinking.

As a result, the defendant, together with C and non-name victims, sustained injuries, such as the 1 cage cage cage fage, which requires approximately 28 days medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. As shown in the facts charged, each victim’s legal and investigative agency’s statements, witness G and H are made.

B. First, we examine the victim's statement.

1) The victim stated at the police that “the defendant was under interrogation of the suspect (as of September 17, 2016) and the protogram newspaper (as of January 2, 2016) (as of January 2, 2016), the victim stated to the effect that “the defendant was unable to drive the defendant with his arms so that he could not drive the defendant, thereby booming C’s face, and the defendant was exposed to another fright, following the defendant’s escape of the victim, and the defendant was frightd to walk the bridge, and the defendant was fright to walk the bridge due to the outbreak of the victim,” and in this court, the victim stated to the effect that “the defendant was frighted to drink or not, and the victim was frighted to go together after the victim was going beyond the victim.”

2) However, on the day of the instant case, after receiving 112 reports stating that “three persons spaw off,” the police sent to the site of the instant case, and one of the Defendant spawned, and the victim, C, and the Defendant went to the police station.

However, according to the arrest report (6 pages of investigation records) and investigation report (10 pages of occasional records), the police officer dispatched listened to the contents of the damage and escaped from the victim, C and the escape.

arrow