logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.07.17 2019고단1834
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc. at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch, and the Defendant terminated the execution of the sentence on September 29, 2017, on the grounds that the term of imprisonment had been terminated before the final and conclusive judgment of the sentence was terminated. On February 19, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the same court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 5, 2019.

1. On January 25, 2019, in front of the C cafeteria located in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu, at around 04:00, the Defendant: (a) caused the injury to the victim D’s bridge due to the victim D (at the age of 23)’s neglect on his own; (b) caused the victim E (at the age of 41); (c) took the face of the victim E (at the age of 41); (d) took the head by drinking, taking the head by hand, and going beyond the floor; and (d) caused the victim D to each injury to the victim D by taking approximately two weeks of treatment; and (e) taking approximately 35 days of the closure of the scke scke cke scke scke scke scke scke scke scke scke scke scke scke s

2. At around 04:20 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to damage the patrol vehicle, which is a public object, by selling the partitions and glass windows installed inside the patrol vehicle at hand and by a hand, without any particular reason while moving to the said zone, at the time, after boarding the patrol vehicle according to the recommendation of H in the circumstances surrounding the said patrol vehicle, which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the time, and then moving to the said zone. However, the Defendant failed to perform an attempted act because the above partitions and glass windows were not installed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning I, E, and D;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (unwritten records and confirmation reports, confirmation of the period of repeated crimes), personal confinement status, and application of each statute of judgment;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Articles 143 and 141 of the Criminal Act (the point of attempted damage to goods for public use) and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes:

arrow