Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person shall interfere with the business of any other person, organization, or person performing official duties due to a disturbance, etc. without any provision of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

On December 29, 2019, at around 00:30, the Defendant obstructed the duties of the above police officers performing official duties by hearing their horses to return home from police officers, such as the police officer E, etc., belonging to the police officer of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station, who was called to the scene after receiving 112 reports from the front of the “C” located in Pyeongtaek-si B, which was called to the scene, and by blocking the patrol police officers, who want to return home to another place after visiting the scene, and by blocking the patrol police officers, who want to return home to the other place after visiting the scene.

2. The Defendant attempted to damage an article for public use, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), stated that “I will give a taxi fee, francing a patrol vehicle,” but the police officer refused it and recommended him to return home, and attempted to remove the patrol vehicle, which is an article for public use, from a police officer to a police officer again and then let him go to a police officer go home, but did not go to an attempted crime because the police officer failed to go through the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing police officers' written statements E in the court statement of the accused;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 143 and 141(1) ( point of attempted damage to public goods) of the Criminal Act, Article 3(2)3 ( point of interference with business) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which impedes police officers’ legitimate performance of official duties due to the Defendant’s crime, but the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflects the crime, that there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and that there was no other record of punishment for the same crime, and that the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for the crime and circumstances after the crime, etc. are determined as ordered by