1. An authenticated copy of an executory deed No. 566 of the deed of notary public’s B office against the Plaintiff by the Defendant.

In addition to the written evidence No. 1’s whole purport of the pleading, the Plaintiff Company may recognize the fact that on July 30, 2014, the document No. 566 of the notary public’s office was issued to the Defendant, stating the intent of borrowing KRW 200,000 without borrowing money from the Defendant, and the consent clause for compulsory execution.

Since there is no enforcement bond according to the above facts of recognition, the defendant's compulsory execution based on an executory exemplification of a notarial deed No. 566 of 2014 against the plaintiffs is rejected.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.