beta
Cases
2019Do821 A. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (compreting deceptive means, etc.)
(b) Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (quasi-decent act by compulsion);
(c) Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Indecent Act by Compulsion);
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Han Law Firm Han-ro
[Defendant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 3 others
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2018No1767 Decided December 27, 2018
Imposition of Judgment
April 3, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the disposition). Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the credibility of the victim’
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Lee Dong-won
Justices Kim Gin-soo