1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

A. Attached 1. Map 1, among the area of 507 square meters in Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, and ①.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Seongdong-gu, Changwon-si, Seongbuk-gu, 507 square meters in size.

B. On June 13, 2008, the Defendant purchased a wooden boat string ground housing of 26.45 square meters constructed on the land of 507 square meters in Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Seoul, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of E on June 17, 2008. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 17, 2017.

C. On July 22, 2008, the Defendant was placed above 507 square meters from the Plaintiff, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si.

The part of the site of the housing stated in the port was leased at one million won per annum (hereinafter “instant lease”). The Plaintiff and the Defendant increased the rent to KRW 1.2 million per annum in around 2012.

The Defendant entered into the instant lease agreement and subsequently entered into the agreement.

It has been occupied and used until now by constructing a 26.45 square meters in the wooden tank, string roof house, 26.45 square meters in attached Table 1.29 square meters in attached Table 1.(1) and a steel framed and string roof, 44.29 square meters in attached Table 1.29 square meters in attached Table 1.29 square meters in a string and string roof, a warehouse and a park 15.75 square meters in part (2) and a park 15.75 square meters in a terring part (3) part (3) and teras6.64

(hereinafter the Defendant newly built each of the above buildings is “the instant building,” and the part of the site of the instant building among the area of 507 square meters in Seongdong-gu, Changwon-gu, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Seoul, is 6.68 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

E. On July 4, 2016, the Defendant paid the rent of KRW 1.2 million (the rent for the period from July 23, 2016 to July 22, 2017) under the instant lease agreement, and did not pay the rent thereafter.

F. The Plaintiff stated in the cause of the instant complaint that the instant lease contract will be terminated, and the instant warden served on April 20, 2017 on the Defendant.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 5, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, 3-1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. According to the fact that the lease contract of this case is terminated, there is no agreement on the term of the lease of this case.