(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.10.17 2017고합87

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.10.17 2017고합87

살인

Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for twenty five years.

Seized knife knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant was a ship of Chinese nationality, and the defendant was working together with the victim E (45 years old) who is a ship of Chinese nationality in Kimcheon-si, a manufacturer of automobile parts in Kimcheon-si.

While the Defendant had considered that he had to return to China due to the expiration of employment visa, and that he was prevented from living in China, he had the mind to kill himself and purchased a knife (No. 1 and knife length 19c) and concealed it in the factory site of the company.

On July 5, 2017, around 17:30 to 19:30 on July 5, 2017, the Defendant thought that the injured person was disregarding the Defendant, and was willing to kill the injured person.

On July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00, at the aftermath of the factory of the above company, the victim would be able to rest, and (b) the victim would be able to have a knife a knife of the victim’s left knife with the food knife that was prepared in advance, (c) the knife of the victim’s knife, so far as the heart knife can be caused by the heart knife and the heart knife, and (d) the victim died by a low blood shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. An investigation report (with respect to the screen of on-site CCTV and screen images CDs);

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site photographs and death medical certificates;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of search and seizure [the defendant did not plan the crime and committed the crime of this case by the victim's intentional action];

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the timing and details of the Defendant’s purchase of the criminal tools that can be confirmed by the above evidence, as well as the shape and characteristics of such tools (knife, knife, 19cc length), the place where the Defendant had been kept before and after the commission of the crime, the method of the crime, such as knife, degree, frequency, etc. of the Defendant’s knife and knife the victim, and the behavior and behavior immediately after the Defendant’s direct criminal record, the Defendant prepared the criminal tools in advance with the same background as the

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고합28

-대구고등법원 2017.12.21 2017노515

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.09.12 2013고합23

-수원지방법원 2013.02.20 2012고합1082

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.05.16 2019고합12