logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.12.22 2013가합205170
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff; Defendant B’s KRW 28,960,900; Defendant D’s KRW 229,90,000; and each of them, from September 24, 2014 to September 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 25, 2009, Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Land and Housing Corporation”) on March 25, 2009, with 189,710 Dong 1101 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) for a rental deposit of 189,710,000 won (the contract deposit of 37,90,000 won was paid before the contract date, the remainder of 151,810,000 won, monthly rent of 710,000 won, the scheduled date of occupancy, 2010, 2010, and 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, and 110,010, 2010, 2010, and 10,000,000 won were leased after the lease agreement for sale (hereinafter “the lessee”).

In addition, on March 25, 2009, Defendant B paid the down payment of KRW 37,900,000 to the Nonparty Corporation in accordance with the instant lease agreement.

B. Defendant B transferred to G the status of lessee, including the status to be entitled to purchase the apartment of this case first in the future (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the right of lease of this case”), and issued all documents necessary to secure the right of the apartment of this case, such as a written consent to trade of blank real estate in his name, a blank sales contract, a letter of delegation of blank, a monthly rent contract prior to blank, a letter of waiver of right, a letter of performance, a letter of confirmation of transaction, etc.

On April 26, 2010, G transferred the right to lease of this case to Defendant D with the so-called plenary session of KRW 29 million and delivered all the documents.

C. On July 5, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) as a broker of Defendant C (No. 103, the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu) in the above brokerage office, Defendant D, G, and J at the above brokerage office, Defendant B, the lessee, and the actual transferor are examined as follows.

arrow