logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.05.17 2017나214313
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a student who was enrolled in the first grade and fourth grade of J Middle School, a public middle school in 2016, and was enrolled in the said school until November 4, 2016, and Plaintiff B and C is the parent of Plaintiff I. Defendant D is the teacher of Plaintiff I, the teacher of the head of the household, the principal of the household, Defendant G, and F are the assistant principal and the principal of the school, and Defendant H is a person who worked for the secondary education support and the human rights of life.

B. Plaintiff I was in charge of the position of “school violence another guardian” in accordance with Defendant D’s proposal at the beginning of the semester in 2016, and it was difficult for Plaintiff I to go through harassment or to play the play of “abrupted” or “abrupted dispute,” and Plaintiff B reported the three above to the School Violence Committee as an aggressor student.

C. Defendant D: (a) identified the facts of the reported case with respect to the instant case via the student’s statement; (b) decided on August 29, 2016 case M and N; and (c) on August 31, 2016 case with respect to L, respectively, to terminate the case according to the Plaintiff B’s consent; and (d) reported L’s case with respect to the sexual intercourse with L’s sexual organ on one occasion to which Plaintiff A was suspected of sexual indecent conduct; and (b) drafted a notarized agreement to confirm that Plaintiff A’s sexual intercourse with respect to the reported case with respect to the sexual intercourse with the sexual intercourse with the two students’ parents.

Plaintiff

B Report of September 2, 2016, the School Violence Committee held on September 2, 2016 deemed each of the above cases to be a closed case, and it concluded as a result of the Committee’s deliberation that “the matters to be resolved in the preliminary question, the result of the preliminary investigation of school violence, and the countermeasures to prevent school violence during the second semester.”

E. However, Plaintiff I complained of difficulties in school life even after the above case, and Plaintiff B took place a thing in order for Defendant D, E, G, and F to go through the process of handling school violence cases.

arrow