1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On March 1, 2012, Plaintiff A “D Elementary School F Branch Schools” (hereinafter “instant school”) located in Chungcheong City E (hereinafter “instant school”) around March 1, 2012.

) A student who was transferred to another school is the Plaintiff’s father, and Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s father. 2) The third and fourth years of the instant school were 3 and 2, including Plaintiff A, and G was sarged in the third and fourth years.

G around 13:10 on July 5, 2012, around 13:10, around 5:0, at the school office of the above F branch school, the teacher H and the telephone conversations were sent to the teacher.

3) At around that time, I, a student of the instant school, had the arms of Plaintiff A attached to the instant school, and the next day, the Plaintiff A did not attend the instant school (hereinafter referred to as the “instant G”) and the fact that Plaintiff A’s arms were added to Plaintiff A’s arms is “school violence asserted by the Plaintiff.”

B) On February 10, 2014, Plaintiff B filed a civil petition with the Chungcheongnam-do Office of Education regarding school violence, etc. Around February 11, 2014, the Superintendent of the Provincial Office of Education of Chungcheongnam-do sent an official letter to the head of Defendant D High School, stating that “The adequacy of the handling of the school violence case, the handling of the victim’s entry into the school, and the handling of the school violence case, and the handling of the school violence case, and the handling of the school violence case by the attending teacher G, would have the intention to take measures against the school violence.”

Accordingly, on February 14, 2014, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence at D Elementary Schools (hereinafter “the First Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence”) was held on February 14, 2014, and as a result of the deliberation, the following decision was rendered to the effect that “G’s act does not admit school violence as a matter of school violence among teachers, and I was dealt with as a right to close down Plaintiff A, and that it is not recognized as school violence, and that Plaintiff A’s exit and treatment shall be requested to the Office of Education later.”

2) On May 27, 2014, the Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence at D Elementary Schools (hereinafter referred to as the “Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence”) is the Second Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence.