logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.25 2018고단2750
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 6, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on July 6, 2012, and KRW 2 million as a fine in the same crime in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, which was issued by the Defendant.

[Criminal facts] Around August 3, 2018, the Defendant driven CM5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.169% in blood at approximately 500 meters on the front road of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 3, 2018.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver who is to be placed in the State, investigation report, suspension of drinking and report on the detection of the driver who is to be placed in the State;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, replys to inquiries, investigation reports (the same kind of force);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: The fact that there are three times the records of punishment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, the circumstance that the amount of alcohol concentration in the blood is high: The fact that there was no record of punishment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act during the last six years, and that there was no record of punishment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act during the last six years, taking into account the defendant's age, sexual behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow