1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim and Defendant C are dismissed.

2...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment] The Court of First Instance 2 of the three pages of the first instance judgment is "leaseed."

The 3rd to 12th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be as follows.

D. On July 31, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants as a crime of interference with general traffic, and the prosecutor of the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office planted 4gglue trees on the land No. 2 of this case on July 31, 2014, and requested the Gwangju District Court to issue a summary order of KRW 3 million for each fine to the effect that the Defendants interfered with traffic by installing a pipe and its water network on the land No. 3 of this case (No. 12701).

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified on the ground of its conclusion, and all appeals filed against the defendant B and counterclaims and appeals filed by the defendant C are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.