logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고단3366
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 6, 2019, at around 00:45, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the restaurant operated by the victim C in Kimhae-si Kim Jong-si, the Defendant heard the horses from the victim that “I would not continue to engage in funeral services because I would not continue to engage in funeral services”, and obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant for about 10 minutes by avoiding disturbance.

2. Around 01:30 on the same day as above 1.3, the Defendant: (a) placed a stone (ro 19cm, vertical 13.7cm, height 11.5cm), which is a dangerous object, at the place of the above 1.1.m.; and (b) damaged the Defendant’s cafeteria’s cafeteria glass entrance, thereby causing damage to the repair cost.

3. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration number.

On October 6, 2019, at the parking lot near Kimhae-si B, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender at the E-Gyeong, etc. affiliated with the D District Police Station D District of Kimhae-si, and (b) caused the Defendant to be punished by failing to pay the past fine due to the demand to receive the resident registration number from the head of the E-mail; and (c) unlawfully used the other person’s resident registration number by speaking a pro-friendly F resident registration number of the other person who was in the external friendship.

4. On October 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 09:18, at the G Team office of the Kimhae-si Police Station G Team located in Kimhae-si; (b) was examined from H’s circumstances; (c) was friendly F; and (d) signed “F” at the end of the interrogation protocol; and (c) was stamped.

5. The Defendant, at the time, at the place as indicated in the above 4. Paragraph 4., and as stated in the above 4. Paragraph 4, issued the F’s protocol of interrogation of the suspect under the name of the F to the G Team H of the Kim Sea Police Station, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on investigation (with respect to stones of dangerous objects);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs.

arrow