The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Unlike the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not commit an injury by assaulting the victims, and thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or misapprehending the legal principles.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victims' statements, which are presumed to have been partially distorted, but at least the victims' statements about criminal facts acknowledged by the court below, are made from investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, and the police officer called to the scene immediately after the case confirmed that the victim I was red, and the police officer called to the scene was arrested and confirmed that the victim I complained of the victim I's statements on the chest part after the arrest (see, e.g., two right 16 pages of investigation records). This was highly reliable. According to the above report, the victim I was presumed to have been subject to violence on the chest part of the victim, and it was presumed that the victim was exposed to the victim's statement of damage, ③ the victims was visited to the hospital immediately after the case, and the victim I was subject to treatment from the victim's statement to the victim's own point of view, and the victim's statement was consistent with the victim's statement of injury.

There is no circumstance to deem that the Defendant was injured or suffered from other causes, and 4. G witnessing the scene stated in the court below that there was no assault by the Defendant, such as breathing the victim’s breath or her chest, etc. However, considering the fact that it is difficult for the Defendant to trust G’s statements in the aforementioned dispatch report as it clearly goes against the contents of the report, the Defendant abused the victims as stated in the facts of the crime at the time of original trial.