logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.05.03 2017누86646
인사기록카드기록 및 확인서 발급거부 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the part written by the court of first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited. In the part written by the court of first instance, "B University was appointed as a full-time lecturer (philosophilosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosophsolosophsolosolosolosophsolosolosophsolosolosolosophsolosophs)" was appointed as a full-time lecturer (prolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosophsolosophsolo, 195). The part written by the court of first instance was appointed as an associate professor (prolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosoph

Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 12" in Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with "No. 13".

"3. Conclusion" in the judgment of the court of first instance (the part 6.1 to 4) shall be deleted.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow