The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one hundred months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable;

2. Although there are no extenuating circumstances in view of the fact that the defendant had been punished by imprisonment without prison labor or more, and that the defendant would not take part in the operation of the illegal game room again after being detained, the type of illegal game room business like the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, needs to be severely punished by severe social harm, such as encouraging the general public's spirit of gambling and failing to break down the home economy. Above all, the game products provided to the defendant's illegal game room are highly valuable, and the nature of the crime can be assessed to be very serious when considering the fact that the defendant's direct exchange was committed. Considering the above circumstances such as the defendant's power, character, behavior, age, environment, etc., the risk of repeating the crime is considerably likely, the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months sentenced by the court below is not excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.