logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 02. 12. 선고 2014다229269 판결
(심리불속행) 건물신축도급계약에 있어서 건물의 소유권을 도급인에게 귀속시키기로 합의한 경우에는 소유권은 도급인에게 귀속된다.[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2013Na2015188 (Law No. 25, 2014)

Title

(In the contract for new construction of a building, if the ownership of the building is agreed to vest in the contractor, the ownership belongs to the contractor.

Summary

(Main) In the contract for new construction of a building, if the contractor has agreed to vest the ownership of the completed building in the contractor even if the contractor completes the building in his/her effort and materials, the ownership of the building belongs to the contractor.

Related statutes

Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal

Cases

2014Da229269, cancellation, etc. of registration of initial ownership

Plaintiff-Appellant

0 Construction Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellee

Republic of Korea 22 others

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Na2015188 Decided December 12, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

December 2, 2015

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by independent parties intervenors.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow