logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.10 2017나7124
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 19, 2015, the Plaintiff is the party to the dispute. On November 19, 2015, the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Building Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”).

(3) A fire insurance contract under the name of the insured (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

(2) The Defendant is engaged in the manufacturing business of lighting in the trade name of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building on the D ground by leasing approximately seven square meters.

3) The “G” is a restaurant located in the part other than the part E among the buildings for wooding in the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground, and the main part of the “G” is located directly adjacent to the Ma and directly adjacent to the main part. The part of the “G” is adjacent to the main part of the building, and is located in the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu ground. The “H” is a tea house located in the 1st floor of the above “G” building, which is directly adjacent to the building, Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and the wall of the “H” building, which is located in the “G”, and the two floors of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu ground building, Seoul, which may be listed through stairs between the “H” and the “G, are vacant houses. (b) On November 28, 2015, the second floor of the building and the second floor of the building were excavated from the roof around 12:02, and thus, the fire-fighting house was destroyed by the fire-fighting house.

2) The amount of damages in B caused by the instant fire is KRW 24,53,785, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 21,000,000 as insurance money for the damages incurred on February 16, 2016. (c) Opinions of relevant agencies on the fire causes in the paper fire fighting site investigation report are as follows: The first reporter’s statement that the fire fighting site investigation report was postponed on the roof of E: the second reporter’s statement that the fire fighting site was postponed on the roof of E and the fire fighting room inside the E workplace was discovered through the roof of E timber.

arrow