logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.05.14 2013노2370
상해
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The victim D consistently stated that the defendant received the victim's chests several times, and in light of the fact that the victim's statement is consistent with the victim's statement in light of the fact that the victim's statement is written with chest pains and scarfafafafafafafafafafaf, on the part of the victim's injury

(b) Even if not recognized as family injury, the defendant's head was the victim's chest part of his breast constitutes a physical force against human body, and thus, the appellate court should be found guilty of the part of the conjunctive assault added in the appellate court.

2. Judgment on the primary facts charged

A. The lower court determined that: (a) at the time, the Defendant: (a) at the time: (b) the Defendant was frightened with frightening her head and frightened with her head with frightening her head; (c) the Defendant’s key was smaller than D and appears to have contacted the Defendant’s head’s head on D’s chest; (d) the Defendant’s head appears to have been only her head was frighted with D’s head; (b) the injury diagnosis on the level of 2 and 3 weeks depending solely on the symptoms the parties complained against; and (c) it is difficult to view that the injury diagnosis submitted by D had the value of evidence above D’s statement; and (c) it was prescribed in light of the circumstances where evidence was actively produced, such as submitting a written diagnosis of injury.

In full view of the fact that it is difficult to see that a certain injury was inflicted on D solely on the ground that he/she or he/she performed taking a medication, he/she acquitted him/her on

B. Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to eliminate reasonable doubts as to the facts charged against the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

3. Preliminary.

arrow