A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:50 on March 6, 2020, the Defendant, in front of the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, had caused the dispute for reasons of the foregoing E and non-commercial reasons, he collected a sign which was prohibited from parking in front of the above restaurant, and caused a damage to the victim’s property by getting off the signboard which was prohibited from parking in front of the above restaurant and making it close to the glass window which is owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, internal investigation reports (theF interview for witnesses and the verification of CCTV);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although there are several kinds of force to commit the instant crime on the grounds of suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, it again leads to the instant crime, the Defendant’s mistake is contrary to the recognition of his/her mistake, and there is no record to commit a crime exceeding the fine. The victim is not punished by the Defendant, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, occupation, family relationship, motive and means of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in light of all the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, occupation